Climate change not debatable

polar bear on ice

The climate is obviously changing. We seem to be experiencing more extreme weather than we have in recent history and our seasons even seem to be off. The debate, however, is over whether or not climate change is caused by human activity or is a naturally occurring cycle the planet goes thru.

Lunatic leftists vehemently argue that “global warming” has occurred because of carbon emissions. The carbon emissions are destroying the ozone, they say, therefore causing the temperature of the earth to increase.

Real science has disputed these claims for years and now over 31,000 scientists have signed a petition against this junk science, warning the United States not to engage in international agreements that promote the myth of man-made global warming.

Humans Are Free reports:

According to the study, “During the last hundred years the temperature is increased about 0.1°C because of CO2. The human contribution was about 0.01°C.” 

This means that anthropogenic (human caused)  global warming is a scam, which is precisely why 31,487 scientists have signed a petition in which they denounce the global warming science, as junk science. 

Even on NASA’s website you will find an article entitled “Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds“, where it is explained how a team of  ” 32 authors from 24 institutions in eight countries, have affirmed that CO2 has had a re-greening effect on vegetation all over the world “
This is common knowledge. All trees and woody shrubs form their wood from the CO2 they extract from the air. The more CO2 the more growth. Oxygen and nitrogen are in parts / hundred in the air. CO2 is in parts/billion. That’s how very little there is and the increase of a few parts/billion is miniscule! The whole climate scam is the marxist way of controlling you and your property without just compensation as required by the constitution. The founder of Greenpeace said he had to leave it because it became the new home of the Communists after the fall of the Soviet Union.

Dr. Edso of ASU produced a most excellent video about 30 or so years ago graphically demonstrating this exact same fact. He grew fruit trees, berry plants and wheat in super saturated areas of C02 and the plants produced about 30-40% greater yields under these conditions. He went on to explain why, as the plants grew, they would of course consume more C02 and that at a certain point Earth would reach a maximum level of C02 and not increase any further.

During the Mesozoic period which includes Jurassic times, there was well over 1000ppm of CO2 and life on our planet was abundant! There is less CO2 in our atmosphere since man has inhabited the planet then well over the majority of earth’s history. Look it up! The climate has and will always change. Human’s have had a negligible effect on it and we would be arrogant to think we could do anything to change it.

“From a quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change on April 25.

“An international team of 32 authors from 24 institutions in eight countries led the effort, which involved using satellite data from NASA’s Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer instruments to help determine the leaf area index, or amount of leaf cover, over the planet’s vegetated regions. The greening represents an increase in leaves on plants and trees equivalent in area to two times the continental United States.” [emphasis added] (Sourcesource)

As it turns out, carbon dioxide is not the enemy but rather an important ally to the environment. As if that wasn’t evidence enough that global warming is a hoax propagated by the left, as it turns out cloud coverage is actually what is responsible for the fluctuation in the earth’s temperature.

As reported by Humans Are Free:

Cosmic rays which are normally deflected via the magnetosphere are, in times of weak or changing magnetic fields emanating from Earth itself, able to penetrate further into Earth’s atmosphere, causing the formation of low-level clouds which cover the land in a kind of “umbrella effect” that shades the land from the sun, allowing cooling to take place. 

But a lack of clouds makes the surface hotter, as would be expected. This natural phenomenon is now documented to be the primary driver of global temperatures and climate, not human activity.

Scientists have affirmed in this study that the earth warms and cools in cycles depending on the changing magnetic fields that emanate off the earth. This has  an impact on earth’s cloud cover. This is a much more logical and reasonable explanation of climate change and one that has been concurred by research done in both Finland and Japan almost simultaneously. As previously mentioned over 31,000 scientists have put their names behind it, around 9,000 of them having their PhD.

This science-backed research gives credence to the view that anyone who continues to promote humans as the cause of global warming either does not know this information or simply has a hidden agenda and does not want an intelligent conversation on climate change. S/he does not want the truth. S/he only wants to feel that he won the argument.

There is something this editor has noted. The US public is expected to be the wiping boy and take all the punishment for everything the world has done wrong. The US is said to cause the most pollution but in fact the US has been cleaning up car exhaust and smoke stacks for decades.

Meantime, come visit me while I spend much of my year in South East Asia – where everyone burns tree limbs, coconut husks, rotted wood, leaves, paper, plastic sometimes synthetic rubber tires, and every sort of garbage nearly every afternoon! No one says “boo.”  Maybe if the Democrats of America think this is such a terrible issue they should try to change the behavior of about 6.5 Billion impoverished people outside the US and Europe.

The issue about pollution, as anyone familiar with high school science should know, is not about CO2 emissions. It should be about CO1, Carbon Monoxide, hydro carbons, heavy metals, undefined chemicals pumped by the multi-billions of tons into the atmosphere by “developed” nations year after year for at least 50-years. No one in US and European Industry speaks about that because to do so would take money out of their own pocket!

Now that we have a developing depression with less ships, trucks and cars moving, surely we should see some climate improvement simply because less fossil fuel is being burned.

For more on the research done, check out the Humans Are Free article.